If you watch much tv, you hear these words all the time in almost every series.
Some tv shows, you hear them every episode.
Writers use them to create conflict. Not just conflict but high stakes. They use them to have a character act out of their nature; to pit allied characters against one another. To warp the character to fit the story.
“I had no choice.”
They’re almost always rooted in extreme conflict (and tv writers have to create conflict again and again, episode after episode). The conflict is sometimes interesting, sometimes contrived, usually designed to force the character into creating even more conflict with the fallout of some terrible choice.
- The villain has threatened the life of someone they love if they don’t do this detestable thing.
- The world is set against them and it’s lose their integrity or lose lives.
- Choose between this person you love and that one.
- Choose a deal with the villain to have the thing you want most.
The choice itself is a moment of conflict when they’re forced to decide.
Then there’s the conflict of actually carrying it out.
Followed by secrets that create tension between the characters.
And the fallout on the other characters and the trajectory of the story from this terrible thing our character has done.
And then the writers ruin all the tension, all this delicious conflict when the secrets are revealed, our character is confronted and utters… “I had no choice.”
Here’s the secret to protect your own writing from the 4 worst words in any story:
Choice is power. It makes life interesting. It makes stories interesting.
When you create the sort of conflict described above, they may only have bad choices, but choosing between two awful things is more interesting than having no choice at all. Because, in these stories it isn’t really that they “had no choice” it’s that they absolve themselves of responsibility with those 4 words. You lose the resonance of your conflict and that awful choice as the character cries and the person they betrayed or disappointed walks away.
How much more interesting would it be for them to own that choice? To stand at the podium and say I decided this was the path I could live with as terrible as it is. How much more does it hurt then watching the person they love walk away?
How does it change the character to not just live with the guilt of that choice but who they’ve become in making it?
How does it change a relationship to confess you chose this life over that one? To apologize and still have to look them in the eye and face how little their words can do to repair this thing they’ve done.
That’s conflict that has depth rather than being a ploy for the sake of conflict.
That’s conflict that requires forgiveness and redemption which are more powerful than trying to absolve themselves of responsibility.
Don’t sacrifice strong characters for the sake of conflict
When people advocate for “strong” women in film and tv and books, they don’t mean physically strong. Or even rigid and undefeatable.
They mean women who make choices and act on those choices which drives the plot. Rather than a heroine who is driven by the circumstances of plot or by the choices of men in the story. It’s often referred to as a character having “agency.”
“I had no choice” eliminates agency completely.
Because by her very words, she is literally unable to make a choice. She is forced into a set of circumstances, unable to determine the course of her life or of the story for herself.
It doesn’t matter if she’s wielding a sword or kicking ass in a brawl, or if he is suave and smart and undefeatable. As soon as the writer puts those words in a character’s mouth, they become weak characters tossed here and there, only ever reacting to the plot. And not very interesting to read about (or watch).